Climate Hoax: Linkfarm

Just so we're clear - We're Fucked. I'll be adding links here as I come across them highlighting the false debate over the climategate disclosures.

Argument 1:
"Conspiracies Cannot Exist"
Here's an article detailing how the climate researchers from around the globe built a self-reinforcing echo chamber for both disseminating and defending their views from actual scientific debate.[Canada Free Press]

Argument 2:
"The Data Still Doesn't Lie"
Despite admissions that raw data sets were modified to hide periods of cooling this argument avoids directly confronting the fact that through suppression of other research venues and perspectives the data doesn't say anything conclusive about man-made climate change, unless you want it to. [Dr. Roy Spencer]

Argument 3:
"Scientists Know What They're Talking About, Trust Us"
Intellectual comment-wars have broken out on websites that were previously purely academic resources, with a small majority of professional scientists encouraging a 'circling of the wagons' to defend the climate conclusion. This argument again avoids confronting directly that leading figures built the "consensus view" upon a fraud. Not to mention the fact that a major avenue of historic climate record making seems to implicate non-human influence more strongly than was previously known. [BBC]

Argument 4:
"A 'Natural' Stasis Exists and Must Be Maintained"
This is perhaps the largest rhetorical fraud to rear it's head in the climategate debate - for it's presence can only be truly recognized in it's distinct absence from the debate. For all intents and purposes it looks as if CO2 levels do not affect climate in the one-to-one manner pushed by climate change gurus. [Again, Dr. Spencer]

Argument 5:
"The Data and the Models Are Explicit"
Well, only when they're told to be. [Cube Antics]